![]() ![]() Unlike Elvis who was cribbing off of established black music forms, the Beastie Boys were there pretty much near the relative early days of hip hop as an art form. I don't think that comparison really stands up. I really don't see the Beasties as the "Elvis of hip hop". dipping in.Īnd listen, I am not saying that what the Beastie Boys did was a sin, myself - but I am asking the question of whether it was in the eyes of the community, whose opinion I trust, and if there is a line - and if there is, where do we draw it? Or, is the racist way the world rewards white artists who crib from Black music not the fault of the artists at all? Like, she pretty much stays in her lane, I just thought on "Louie Bag" there was the slightest. And finally, her MO seems to be to make music with Black artists, rather than to just lift from them and run with the ball herself. She also dresses like what she is, which is a white girl from Arkansas. Meanwhile, Yebba doesn't even stay in "Black mode" with the awkward slang use/genre dipping all the time in the same session I linked to, she's off doing a folk song with a 3/4 waltz time signature. So it's the same question as Elvis - who I also think came by his influences honestly - to what degree can a white person borrowing from a culture get out ahead of it and enjoy success before the original culture does? When is it okay to do that - is it when you get organic exposure to the culture like the Beasties? And because they were just about "the Elvis of hip-hop." In 1986, when MTV wouldn't even play rap videos unless they were heavily rock-oriented (Beastie Boys' guitar-featuring "Fight For Your Right" and Run-DMC's Aerosmith collaboration, "Walk This Way," being literally it as far as representation that year), the Beasties were, unlike the struggling other artists in the genre, touring the world opening for Madonna and enjoying heavy video rotation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |